Compositor SoftwareCompositor Software

Tag : TC-TRSRRT2048

CP-6137-960FX server

By ruslany

Compositor Software builds virtual servers for Microsoft Windows and Android platforms

Compositor Software builds virtual servers for Microsoft Windows and Android platforms

Compositor Software presents 4 architectures on C++. It is TC-TRSRRT2048, TC-SUBTRSRRT262144, TC-2SUBTRSRRT262144 architectures for STC2k, RTC4k, RAD96 and RAD36 platforms correspondingly. Now, when Compositor Software code repository have grown, it is time to move forward past the MaxMSP platform. First, Compositor Software thanks the JUCE framework for providing an ideal platform to make servers. Compositor Software would like to thank Iain Patterson for providing NSSM application, which helps creating daughter services and allows making full scale server out of company code, written on Gen~ platform. Of course, the main tool is and still the MaxMSP platform, because the original Compositor Pro 1 project was entirely made on MaxMSP objects and later rewritten using Gen~ object. It allowed exporting an authentic C++ code out of MaxMSP 6 platform. Additionally, we want to thank Cycling ’74 for providing a project to build exported code in JUCE and Microsoft for providing Visual Studio 2019 Community, which allowed to make final builds of Windows versions.

Before making standalone apps, Compositor architecture codes compiled from several minutes to 5 hours at runtime. Now, programs load in seconds and consume lower system resources than original MaxMSP Runtime applications.

Using Gen~ platform and JUCE it was possible to build RAD96 mobile application, which allows transforming your smartphone into a complete autonomous system with Compositor kernel of last generation. This way, Compositor Software moving into the IoT side conception to create a network of devices, controlled by CP-6137-960FX server, which runs the aforementioned services. This modification allows upgrading the device performance from Windows NT 4.0 kernel (Linux 2.6.18 kernel on Android) to 8th generation Compositor kernel. It includes x2048 oversampling, digital shutter with interpolation, second derivative of a function and 8th order Butterworth filters.

The desktop version of Compositor Software 4th generation experimental kernel (TC-TRSRRT2048 architecture) has virtual accumulator module, which allows controlling the physical accumulator charge and performs charging each time network activity occurs. This kernel can be used on mobile platform also.

Compositor kernel architecture itself is a modular architecture if described by using physical blocks. The amount of modules depends on its usage. In base configuration, Compositor is NTP-server core service. In advanced configuration, it is L2TP client-server application with tunnel authentication capabilities. However, Compositor Software doesn’t set Compositor RTOS 9.0.2 as deprecated platform due to this move. It is only made because of the fact that pre-built application-service has much higher uptime in comparison to Runtime with dll modules of MaxMSP. The fact that, RAD96 mobile is on the constant expose due to the network presence on the device itself, CP-6137-960FX server supports its calculation, serving for distributed computation. It is performed using 2nd order transfer function, which can stack a lot of devices with minimal expenditures, and RAD36 platform supports such computation by multithread 12-cores L1-L3 architecture.

By ruslany

TC-SUBTRSRRT262144 Architecture

TC-SUBTRSRRT262144 Architecture

TC-SUBTRSRRT262144 architecture is the i11 architecture with a processing power capable of running an operation system at speed of 5-omega in real-time.

Compositor kernel was forced in loop again after submitting the RT-z128 prototype to Compositor 5 rack. It is a hypervisor rack and the main difference from the v3 hypervisor is that it consists of MDL12 and AVOX developments. In Compositor 5 you have an opportunity to inject Compositor v3 into the net by the modem and resynthesizer instead of direct ether injection. It is safer but consumes many resources. After the main tests were conducted, I decided to install the one more layer in Compositor kernel. The discretization process goes twice: at transmission rate and on intermediate frequency. This way the system mutates to a system with intermediate frequency. I made it for the purpose of the preliminary line before entering main transmission rate line. Here is where a new prefix of SUBTR goes from. SUB means transmission rate sub frequency and TR stands for transmission rate. I’ve already tested the new kernel loop for its connectivity and should say that 4-layer structure can give much more pleasant results. It has much longer connection duration, more saturated, and leads to constant communication. However, breaking the loop in 4-layer structure, I operate in a new type of OS. It is no longer an open AI system. It has the qualification channel for all the information, which passes into the main line. The rule here is to filter out offensive traffic and leave only the bypassed part of it. It acts like the waterfall on the rocks: when water hits the stone, it divides the flow into two streams and if there are 12 such stones, for example, I have 24 streams. But, not in this case. I actively compress the data,  and it remains in memory buffer, that’s why systems capacity is larger now.

System flushes results are satisfactory. They are more consistent and enable more packets of information to be send during the initiation of connection. Compositor kernel has freezer functions for operation system faults. The main reason Compositor kernel upgrade performed is to remove the stochastic manipulator from the TR level leaving the SUB level for the stochastic manipulation instead. You have a choice of not performing an action and leave it in a buffer for a subsequent flush. However, I admitted that many actions blocked this way and they are all forced to be done while flushing. This raises the question again: Can I actively block feedback on negative odd channel completely? And while the SUB level is only a temporary solution, the permanent solution for FWOS will be to implement more technics working with feedback besides of shuttering, window composition, transfer function selection and vector dimension changes in real-time. While the kernel loop is interrupted, the idea is to have two states for the OS: system load, for which I should implement two or three iterations of kernel loop to perform flushes for the current machine, and system work state. While being a FWOS, system loses many of its connection points gained in a fast kernel loop state. Being a communication device, it is not acceptable behavior. I need to have an implementation that manages flushes in real-time. Going from vector array to a packet transmission should be performed regularly to flush blocked traffic. For a local machine, blocked traffic can include visiting specific servers, sending out brief messages and a sum of all other activity in Ethernet, which fulfills the normal style of work. However, as the question raised, I need to switch the negative odd channel traffic from one point to another. This also moved me to solution of blocking negative odd feedback completely. Negative odd channel produces only unacceptable traffic by means of three-fold system with opposites, which are plus, minus and central channel. While enabled in Compositor kernel version 7.3.1, which is an OS kernel, the problem of communication between negative and positive states remains up to the point of forcing them to the maximum allowed state for the musical system, such as in RT-z128. This alteration is visualized on the lower i/o vector sizes. When the system halts, only two states remain, such as 0 or 1. Increasing i/o vector size to the minimum working condition of 2048 samples in a bin allows RT-z128 to work with a buffer of 262144 samples, which is the number in the development name. I no longer wish to move to i13 as 1024 samples buffer experiments show no practical use for the scale of it. i11 architecture transmits the odd channel in the acceptable range, making its values sufficient for subsequent scaling.

The challenge for an odd communication is a constant threat to the kernel. And if one threat is qualified and successfully flushed, another threat rises by the fact that it is a negative channel for negative frequencies only. And if they are present in positive spectrum as in Compositor kernel, to remove the negative part of the feedback, the negative frequencies must be implemented in signal chain and the solution maybe is to invert them or play backward the whole negative part not only for SUB channel, but for all odd layers present.

By ruslany

Compositor Max for Live imperative meaning

Due to technological impact and its assotiation to false approvement of all and none, at the beginning of this journey I failed to misconceptualize the whole of the reader point of view on the subject of interstellar communications. Introducing to you a new terms like Compositor Networks I imply the route of false behavior of a person who never achieved anything for a purpose he didn’t even realized. Thus the mailing capability of my software is unusually low at the beginning can’t cope with the subject of creating a network of interstellar travelling through the realization of a purpose, which is evident to see the light and event reading capability. The suggested workload and the subject of consumption of technology was on the higher-rate human being can acheive. Thus I was able to make a one step breakthrough pointing out the refusal from Fast Fourier Transform and entering the realm of exponential discretization (not yet technically achieved). The list of notions is the purpose, which we read and understand and as we go deeper into the subject I realize the inability of habitable communication with the technology provided, thus a refusal from all of you on accepting this. My original idea is not intent and is far from realisation, yet on a project like this the behalf of creator is undeterminate opinion of someone else outcome. And thus to minimize such outcome on a project, which leading force is to empower us with materialistic approach to the subject of creation new life we undergo further communication.

My endevour is not only to discuss, but to customize subject appropriately to my needs and needs of society. None of the provided subjects made me happy with the intent of creator. The system unnamed can be applied to anything without any difficulty. But the final decision is to make Compositor as the name implies the Enigma of 21st century. It is difficult instrument and as cryptography evolved I can view a Compositor Max For Live device as a rare 1940s machine due to a virtualization of v12 engine and it’s mechanics to a one function interface with exponential interpolation. I write here to make a challenge rather than to try to involve the reader in a funding project. The challenge is to decipher final Compositor TCTRSRRT2048 interface, which I suggest as a block cipher with 128-bit encryption. The software in it’s final revision works on 2.6GHz transmission rate and has all freedoms of operation. Rather than to decipher in xyz let’s do this in Spherical Interaction Network (SIN). I accept your point of view on the subject of inspecting the code. This could be done. Even though you will be unable to decipher. I although liked to solve crosswords with my Granny!

CP-6137-960FX server
Compositor Software builds virtual servers for Microsoft Windows and Android platforms