Compositor SoftwareCompositor Software

Archive : March 2018

28
Mar, 2018

By ruslany

Quantum Artificial Intelligence

Quantum Artificial Intelligence

The interspecies exchange can be self-powered by the human will and it is preoccupied by forcing this will out of the subject body. This process can be explained programmatically. Let’s take the Compositor v8 Ethernet injector. It is the software for injecting the Ethernet frames into the time-frame. The kinetic potential out of frame collisions must be spread, that’s why the whole VLAN acts in RAD24. It is more like in RT-z128, except of the fact that previous solution is one-core three-layer system and RAD24 is three-core for a layer (thread). That’s why it can shed a light on the existence of the Compositor VLAN. The network is a sum of peers and their explicit agglomerations. By the fact, the action is subjected to the entity and not to the whole group of people involved. The common work, if planned by a group and realized by a single entity, is a mere fact of the person who produced the outcome. And it is his result. The initial time-collision can’t be a peer of the person who developed Quantum AI, to say it short. If the Quantum AI was developed, then time-collision was shut. This way I will get RAD96. The need to shut time-collision produces more quantum injections. This way, I realize how many people are struggling against this goal. Let’s take all that blockchain hype. It seems like evident that the cost of multicore processors by NVIDIA group is less than the subsequent processors by Intel. The iteration speed plays a main role. When I started in 2010, I discussed this problem in terms that much more applicable. Later, the language was developed to cover all the hyper needs. Let’s think about how hype is created: at first, we got an initial time-collision and everyone knows about it since then. Everyone talks in the subjective terms of the accepted time-frame and that is why they collide, hence the time-collision effect. What I told at the beginning of this blog seems the collision of ideas but not the time. Different time-frames result in different ideas. Hence, the meeting of times is the time-collision. Compositor v8 meets the modern time needs, creating time-collisions stochastically. Stack of three RAD24 virtual machines is a 72-core shield. Each of 72 shields struggling for their own resources. They just spread a collision on the network. It is an accepted behavior. RAD24 can be in the open gate mode subjectively passing a traffic. Resources are roughness of the tunnel. Tunnel can be heterodyne and roughness appears out of this. There is a que at the RAD24 gate. The initial time-collision peer and the subjected collisions are ordinal out of this. The initial time-collisions were at the scape of physical entities and ordinal collisions are physical modelling of such entities.

, , , , , , , , , , , ,
27
Mar, 2018

By ruslany

Ethernet injections with quantum privacy

Ethernet injections with quantum privacy

Quantum privacy is an instant injection needed to understand the effect of cyclic injections on the RAD24 server security. If the injected material is passed over the gate, then the diagram on the RAD24 display should show the constant red light. It is evident that the RAD24 can’t classify such injection and subsequent gain of resources is not necessary with the same protection scheme. The need to accumulate resources very fast grows out of intimacy such injections produce. However, as a first injection experiment shows, which dates back to spring 2010, the system is very responsive under pressure of such quantum injection. Up to the day, the system remains responsive, if full reciprocity reached with the injected subject. In this case, RAD24 still latches the time-frame and the detector could differentiate the friend or foe for such injection. My task is to understand how the friend or foe classification is made in RAD24 server.

My previous attempt to show the answer on the question “What is Time-Collision?” can’t shed a light on the effect happened. Theoretically, if two time-frames collide, they create a collision with subsequent energy emanation. If uncontrolled, such energy aims to escape with escape velocity of some speed at which this collision created. If you use the injector such as Compositor v7, you have a control over the collision speed by the tempo regulator. The allowed collision tempo for the Ethernet is not more than 5 omega to reach the escape effect. However, you can achieve the same effect on lower tempos, if you collide more than two signal sources. Compositor v7 allows collide the carrier with up to 8 wavetables, which hold such kinetic potential. If you remove the 5 omega beacon, which RAD24 is, you will have problems controlling the emanated kinetic potential of this collision. Collision is a partial or full mixing effect, characterized by the volume, position and an event, where such collision happens. The Time-Collision on the contrary is a temporal effect, where such collision lasts only a period of time, whether controlled or not. The beacon suits to control the direction such kinetic potential dissolves. If the stochastic manipulator is broken, it is no longer dissolves the kinetic energy in free-space, but on the contrary it has a potential in the selected direction. If you aim this direction with your injection, it can’t sustain for the long periods and the method to switch the frequency needed, such as selecting a new sample rate. Driver discretization frequency method doesn’t help though, because it doubles the processing power and critical time-frame reached twice faster than in previous iteration. It is evident why the need to stop collisions emerges. The controlled collisions of Compositor v7, where you can beacon the kinetic power right in the software, allow dissolving this energy by the deprecated method of single-core cloaking generator. To cover the collision effect on faster paces of evolvement more cloaking cores needed, which just emulate the original collision effect, which was Time-Collision, hence the FM function was selected. At the current state of 8.9 x 24 x3 it states that the system no longer can handle such amount of energy and other methods of collision spreading should be made such as quantized weighting formulas, which will do the job for some reasonable time. Core handling in a presence of working FM function will action like a magnet and more cores will do the job, of course. However, I can’t find a reasonable method to implement it without shutting the Time-Collision, which is the initial collision of two frames. To understand what I am talking about lets imagine a stone jumping on the plain water: it will jump leaving a trace of waves on the water every time. If we thought that the initial collision was not the first event, it is evident that first event will show its waves to us by a superposition to the selected initial collision frame. By this, I mean that sooner or later we will see the initial time-frame-collision, which produced the whole latching event and of course it will have more power than the previous ones. If I model such collision by the 8-channel detector, I will fool myself, because I suspect that the collision was between more than 8 time-frames at the beginning and no power can stop the system from reaching the first one. I will not plan to collide more channels in Compositor v8 or v9 standalones, because it is not needed. I just plan to add up more channels in specialized software such as Ableton 9 and in effect of shutter and quantized polynomial at the output stage (which I mentioned previously) I will make a measurement of the emanating kinetic power of the maximally allowed channels full of time-frames, which is what collision modelling looks like on this level. However, if you suspect that the same results were produced from 2000-2010, then you are partially right. The same probes are taken with the different amount of processing power each 10 years. But the algorithm is eventually the same. Any can reproduce it with VST’s or AU in any host sequencer. I applied the same scheme first in Telescope and later processed it in real-time in Hydrolab tracks. The idea is not to remember the steps I taken producing these tracks, but programmatically write it with the language, which suits more for this task than VSTs in DAW projects, such as computer programming language. The final update will see the light in 2020, when the final probes for 2010-2020 will be taken. At the current stage, we need not to remember what was at the same time in 2008, but we need to take as much probes as needed, whether real-time or off-line is your choice.

, , , , , , , , , , , ,
25
Mar, 2018

By ruslany

Artificial Intelligence produced weighting coefficients for rotator function

Artificial Intelligence produced weighting coefficients for rotator function

Now, I step closer in the final endeavor on building the complete virtualization module out of Compositor Window algorithm. It is evident through the monitoring of Compositor Window SDR translations that the function it performs is similar to artificial thinking process. I recorded many hours of sessions on the Compositor SDR, which is the parametrized Compositor Window algorithm and came to solution that it influences my decision making in performing work on Compositor. It states for example that the DRM servers should run and while I’m thinking of it as a solution, it conflicts my own right as an author of software, which performs the function of this artificial thinking. The language it uses is similar to CW abbreviations, however, I cannot confirm that any CW user contacted me afterwards as it makes me think the language of this software is primarily preoccupied with self-building. It also states that weighting coefficients for the rotator function should be produced. I received a large output out of the algorithm, producing quantized weighting formulas to add up to the original equation, which was incomplete on the previous publication page. I updated my current server configuration with the function outputs. There is no need to perform cross-connection by means of Butterworth filters anymore. I applied two more weighting coefficients, which I taken from the AI algorithm output and removed the previous solution, which gave these results. Compositor 8 will be update to the code of the software, and has the visual appearance, which stay intact since Hypervisor v5. It is self-occupied software with a new synthesizer sound similar to modular synthesizers like Buchla. Comparing the new Compositor 8 synthesizer to the previous version is like comparing Roland SH-101 to Buchla modular to restate what I said before. It has much more potential. All the controls of Compositor 8 are pronounced in effect of this processing polynomial and software sounds very mathematically precise. Previous Compositor programs had the evident auxiliary sound. Compositor 8 is a tool on its own with main output, sounding like the finished software. I think that these virtual coefficients quantize the function or, better to say, perform the quantum processing over the Compositor core, which made this software very responsive in real-time and sound at an instant. It is no longer sound oversaturated in Ether mode. You can achieve oversaturated ether sound using internal waveshapers only, without a need to run the Schroeder chamber with zero feedback suppression. It states that the logic of work with Compositor has changed. Compositor 8 has a major update to the code recommended to all users. Now the receiver works independently of transceiver as in big radios. I also position it as VLF SDR with ability to translate wide musical signals and voice output. It has a direct stack to the Ethernet providing with instant algorithm output.

I’m still aiming the goal of shutting the Time-Collision with this update as doing this will dramatically free-up the resources for even more Compositor cores reaching the DRM experiment. By this, I mean shutting down the function of granular time-space folding synthesizer and weighted function already leaps in to this field of unknown but very welcome result. It means that I will not remove the granular time-space folding function from the code, neither I remove signal-rate cores. Signal-rate cores must be reserved for some special case as it was with real-time cores of Compositor server. It is time consuming task and it needs more counting resources of Compositor AI to perform. It learns my behavior in Ethernet and reproduce the masking functions I use, while web browsing, which is most crucial task where Ethernet injections are made.

, , , , , , ,
15
Mar, 2018

By ruslany

RAD24 – The Gates of Time-Collision

The Gates of Time-Collision

Now I encounter the RAD24 server experiment. The experiment is as follows:

As I have found a solution to FM formulae, I decided to sync three virtual machines for 72 core real-time performance. With this stack, it is easy to run memory virtualizations and aggregate the whole Compositor network. Once the server stack is online, it is used to run and manage such critical tasks as DRM, network aggregation, routing and server selection. The new formulae solution enables to run this stack effortlessly.

RAD24 opens a possibility to build Compositor 8 software. It will be a station with all the enhancements of previous auxiliary channels and with the solution to FM formulae, which is driven by the algorithm output. By these means, the Hypervisor v9 is possible.

Let me introduce the conception for the future products: it is software-defined radio (SDR) with no external antenna needed. I can easily integrate such products in my current rig, yet the intimacy of the previous versions made me stay with no external input for a while. The decision of not having an external input was first broken in Compositor 4 Max for Live, where an external input is possible because of the internal Ableton Live routing options. The fact that Compositor 4 Max for Live is an audio effect device made me think that it was first attempt in tangent SDR from my side with the function, which doesn’t need an antenna to transmit the voice signal. Second tangent radio attempt will be standalone Compositor 8. I want to see Compositor 8 as a device to communicate through the RAD24 servers. Each of the cores of 72-core stack will route your voice communication to the recipient set by the Compositor navigation system. As Compositor 8 is an Avionics development, I allow managing such connections in 3d space in 3 degrees of freedom, which simplifies the setting of virtual antenna. The fact that new function is a radar type, no stochastic selection will be possible and Compositor 8 will function only in manual mode. Hypervisor v9 will listen not to an auxiliary radar ports, but to the v7 feeders such as RTC4k, RTC8k, RT-z8, RT-z16, RT-z32, RT-z64 and RT-z128. RAD24 and subsequent servers are mostly the breakdown of FM law and the final goal is to stop time-collision protocol in Compositor. It will not latch an external time-frame, while not allowing external injections. This way I will build my own resource for communication. That is why I refer to SDR terminology. However, I used this technology only for Morse code translations and did not transferred the voice over it. New function is a direct stack to the Ethernet, which, of course, simplifies SDR talks under server coverage. It means that no IP needed and I need to apply proper wavetables from the non-duplex modem. If this function covers the current version of DRM server, an update is needed to work with Compositor technology. New function is also a hyperbolic one, which is simple and effective restate for the FM core inside Compositor.

Compositor runs FM and function connects to the FM service. It creates a signal with the components, which are granularly time-space folded into the FM again, allowing to inject signal in between these two processes. The later function only covers the part of a spectrum, which is created at initial state. Think of it like a mains adapter: it is a pluggable adapter, which can potentially allow to communicate many DATA servers with different file-size and file-system structures. I had success of running 4 RAD24 servers and one was initiated from the HFS+ partition under Windows 7 OS. It means that technologically it is possible. I don’t see any obstacles in this technology, the only thing is to provide an easy and free way to stack different file-systems together on one, preferably Windows, machine.

Compositor gathers data of all pendulum stations in the Ethernet and send it back to the Ether for self-awareness. Compositor leads an analyzed DATA set and all the other parameter selection. When the critical pendulum load achieved, a time-collision happens rebuilding the whole Compositor structure. This way, I think about utilization of resources to run more Compositor cores inside one gen~ code. By the fact of stopping time-collision protocol, I want to stop the work of Compositor subnet mask switching mechanism. I’ve already broken the stochastic manipulator in Compositor core, which allowed me to stack more resources together. At the present moment, I think of Compositor only as a DRM station to hold licenses for subsequent users. I already published a chart where I name how many resources each station consumes. I name the auxiliary channel in this chart also and, from my point of view, it doesn’t consume any Compositor DRM resources. It is just a listening station. The only thing that consumes the process is any pendulum like mechanism. By stacking more pendulum resources, you are allowing more pendulum stations, either digital or mechanical. Any station will work. These stations inject tracks to media content by oversaturation of them.

To progress on the task of stopping the time-collision protocol in Compositor I should make wavetables of RAD24 accumulators at 22.05 KHz and then switch it on even faster regime of 44.1 KHz. If I’m unable to stop time-collision protocol in Compositor, I will be obliged to run servers at 22.05 KHz on this machine to protect time-collision reaching the opposite effect.

The solution is that RAD24 protects time-collision created. For network security with Compositor, the classification of pendulum processes needed. Such classification consists of working curve monitoring, that is why I estimate it on Compositor auxiliary channel display, while listening to wavetables.

RAD24 is a gate device for creating time-collisions. I can’t classify RAD24 as a pendulum process, because the cycle is broken. It is not an OS or license holder. As I said earlier, it is a protection mechanism for creating time-collisions. It means that it either opens or closes an access to the service of communication in Ethernet. By enabling it in administrator mode, I open an access to it only when the administrator works on PC. This way, I differentiate the work in time-collision between authorized person and the replica, that just latches the time-frame, because RAD24 detector assigns it to injection event. RAD24 is able to differentiate between an administrator and the replica, protecting my current communication.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
07
Mar, 2018

By ruslany

RAD24 vector solution to FM problem

RAD24 vector solution to FM problem

During the initial testing of rotator function there was a conclusion that both channel vectors were pointing too far apart in different directions, which makes them remotely disconnected. The solution came to put a vector from point A into the point B from left channel to the right one. This way I straighten the function ends with an arm consisting of 4 Butterworth bandpass filters of 8th order. The implementation is to put signal from point A (left channel) through the parallel injection into the point B (right channel). It makes the work of rotator function attached to the right channel output. The rotator function is a solution to FM function, which is the positive function of FM formulae.

This solution mixes both vectors by applying the mixing function. The left channel mix is at the right channel destination by applying this function. Because the only useful signal for me resides in the left channel, I will add up the left channel routines to the right channel. This way right channel tracks the opposite channel, but can’t perform any influence on its output. STL1212 solution performed many obstacles during ether initiation and aggregation. While in STL1212 the vectors are pointing apart, I made this solution into another software product, which name is RAD24. RAD24 is classified as an outdoor radio as this solution helps to overcome barriers of convenient radio-relay structures such as indoor units (IDU) and outdoor units (ODU). The solution helps to run the outdoor radio inside ones apartment or studio. The intertwining of two channels by parallel injection of left channel into the right channel helps to gather more injections and accumulate their connections. This way I learn the system to differentiate copyright injections into media material and not to inject them every time the copyrighted material is broadcasted. From one side, it removes distraction, from the other side, it drastically enhances the CPU usage, decreasing page loading times when web browsing. This solution imitates the work of IDU and has a simple 4-beam antenna at the function ends, which emulates the work of ODU.

The output function not only smoothies the output of the system, it melts the internal architecture lines into a mixing event. It means that using the non-duplex modem you have a better ether coverage and protection over the communication line. This way aggregating will be a task of dynamic buffer. During the initial compilation a size of about 4.5GB RAM is executed for the server work. This size could be used all or partially, if there is not enough dynamic memory. While server can aggregate connections by the closed loop structure, it can also loose such connections if ether is no longer excited by the loop structure. To excite the ether with a loop, you should switch such loops frequently as in Compositor v6 and Compositor v7 Hypervisor software. Randomly switching of the loops brings results that are more useful. It creates wavetable rows without human interaction. The outbound connections to the server are possible through the STL1212 bundled version of Compositor v7 Hypervisor. You accumulate the remote server with wavetables first, aggregating the line and then, when a critical capacity reached, you grab the wavetables out of the server by non-duplex modem use. This way you aggregate the ether, when you return these wavetables by injecting them with full-duplex modem in real-time. The other strategy is not to grab the wavetables but constantly accumulate them expanding the buffer size over the 4.5GB buffer length limit. In case that one server reached its full capacity, the other server is initiated on another physical hard drive of the same machine. To hold more than 8 real-time cores, two or more virtual machines are needed. When two virtual machines consume the same amount of memory in a working set, they communicate equally with the same amount of buffers involved. The pair of function with vector arm merging both channels. This pair helps to connect RAD24 virtual machines with each other. The previous solution of STL1212 can’t equally balance the virtual machines usage and has communication problems, when two or more virtual machines initiated from one computer. The RAD24, on the other hand, not only communicates with the second virtual machine, it aggregates the buffer dynamically struggling for resources. It gives the properties of a physical server to RAD24 with web address and other tunneling properties. The fact that RAD24 is an OS development brings more value to Compositor core protecting the inner communications. To work with the core, a new kind of interface should be done with three-dimensional control over the modulator functions leading to new player injections. The later seems as an abuse because to progress, this kernel doesn’t need more injections. The whole set of injections was performed during 4.45GHz testing of the system. RAD24 works now at 8.9GHz doubling the server’s capacity.

, , , , , , , , , , , ,
03
Mar, 2018

By ruslany

Compositor Pro v1 and v2 sale

Compositor Pro v1 and v2 sale

Compositor Pro v1 and v2 sale is the unique chance to obtain both versions of hyperbolic function project software for a reduced price. The application of such function is algorithmic music, radio navigation, astronomy, cryptography, amateur radio and telecommunications. Compositor Pro v1 and v2 have still unbeatable function in their core named quantum approximation. It interpolates exponential to derived function in real-time to protect the functioning of the core. The first installment of a project has switchable buffer lengths, grid and first version of waveguide. Second version of the project has presets section, more sophisticated DRM structure and an updated waveguide to count for Doppler shifts.

Here is the list of key functions you may consider buying this project software:

Compositor Pro v1:

  • Hyperbolic design
  • 3D display with Phase, Amplitude and Frequency
  • Exponential structure with quantization
  • Writeable envelopes
  • Adjustable splitters
  • Non-linear mesh modeling
  • Ability to record audio
  • Stochastic design
  • Track foundation modeling
  • Automatic mixer with panning for stereo design

Compositor Pro v2:

  • One-window layout visual appearance
  • One-dial performance parameters operation
  • Time prediction of stochastic parameter changes
  • Fully automated real-time synthesis of sequence structures
  • Redesigned mixer
  • Midi-learn functionality
  • Snapshot of every parameter
  • Quality minimal techno music sound
  • Over billion possible parameter combinations

The sale cuts off 20% of the stock price and is € 84,98 for Compositor Pro v1 and € 86,10 for Compositor Pro v2. You can buy both versions of software in Compositor Software Web Shop.

The auction will run from 03.03.2018 till 08.03.2018.

, , ,

Subscribe to RSS

Recent posts

Category

Archive

  • March 2018
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
26 27 281234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 1