Compositor SoftwareCompositor Software

Tag : RTC8k

By ruslany

Compositor v3 Hypervisor Radio Shack – Free-Float Generator

Today, Compositor Software announces the Compositor v3 Hypervisor Radio Shack based on free-float generator technology. Three years in the work and finally consists of six modules such as RTC8k, SASER, AI-RT1024, FF8, N9000, TC25 for VLF radio translations.

While it was a general task to make the audio-translation chain as long-as-possible Compositor Software found a solution to use SASER channel feeded by RTC8k chain feeder values. Now, instead of using an internal SASER scanner one can use the LINK function of Compositor v3 Hypervisor Radio Shack rack, which hardwires AI-RT1024, FF8, N9000, TC25 tuning to the current RTC8k radar scanner value, which produces ultra-stable and ultra-long results making it a long endurance system for SLF, ULF and VLF radio communications.

If you are proceeding to own the whole rack, you must obtain licenses for SASER, AI-RT1024, FF8, N9000 and TC25 separately from the Compositor Software Web Shop. In original package for Compositor v3 Hypervisor Radio Shack you get RTC8k license and rack with demo versions of all instruments. This way you can try them and decide what you need for original translations. These instruments are not only suitable to evoke constant radio ether they also suits for radio security. For example, FF8 generator is a quantized signal-rate generator, which quantizes radio translations and can potentially occupy the whole band with rattling patterns.

Besides the tuning, you have smart prediction system based on a block-chain with probability distribution density functions. This helps to establish the connection to transmitting source and magnify the signal using the waveguide normalizers. In Compositor v3 Hypervisor Radio Shack you got visual feedback displays for AI-RT1024, RTC8k and SASER instruments. They help to determine the direction signal source is coming from and to learn the signal by its phase values. In addition, AI-RT1024 display shows how many network dots receiving this signal in the current moment of time suitable for real-time tasks such as navigation.

By ruslany

Closed loop vs. Infinite loop

Here I would start a series of discussions on a topic of radio translation technics and their impact on the radio-electronic security. First, I would stress out the importance of the subject of comparing two modern technics to initiate radio communications, which are closed loop and infinite loop strategies.

Closed loop and infinite loop both have recreation in Compositor Software instruments such as MDL12 for infinite loop structure and RTC4k, RTC8k and RT-z8 for closed loop structure. The infinite loop stays for an infinite time translation and, as a Fourier series, implements the continuous time interval for non-harmonic analysis. Closed loop from the other hand may be a short type of translation like one bar Morse code message. Closed loop much more secure in its implementation. Infinite loop can be easily broken with radio-electronic security instruments. For example, one flyby of AVACS, navigating through the geographic parallel may completely shut down infinite loop radio translations on a territory of the whole country. The infinite loop can be broken partly or at whole, when both positive and negative frequencies does not work, and the only band, which remains in this situation, is a closed loop structure.

Using Compositor Pro v2 one can edit and reinstantiate the Ether on VLF band. First, you can apply Compositor Pro v2 to negative frequencies and then apply it to positive frequencies. Infinite loop communications are not secure and full-duplex modems must have a resynthesis module as Compositor Software instruments has. Not only resynthesis must happen to instantiate closed loop also the transport technics such as output channel detectors must be used. Both Compositor Pro v1 and v2 has closed loop structure on a C language level. This in fact gives much more stable results compared to later machines implemented on GenExpr C++ code. However proper implementation (such as RTC4k, RTC8k and RT-z8) of higher-level machines can be as stable as Pro versions. The most significant difference is that GenExpr machines are fully real-time compared to Pro versions, which have one bar bufferization.

By ruslany

Compositor Software Hypervisor Radio Shack

During the perfection and in attempt to create more stable technology Compositor Software arranged its modules in the Radio Shack structure. By means of virtual machines, the Ableton Live 9 or MaxMSP suits as a platform for hosting micro-kernel machines such as AI-RT1024, FF8, N9000 and TC25. These machines feeds SASER channel with an approximation curve inherited from an RTC8k chain. This way you can potentially receive completely stochastic translations out of VLF band.

You can order different devices for your production from Compositor Software Web Shop.

1 2