What you think you are doing vs. What you are really doing
The main purpose of the VPN-network of the “Niagara” 26 software modem is the processing of the language, both natural and machine-generated. When paired with SDL Trados software, this modem extends the network topology for the Machine Translation cloud. This is done through software extensions, as it was possible to find out the first letters in the name of the emissions mean languages, for example “extreme” issue TT – Tatarcha, the Tatar language is the emission of the “RusNRG – The Trip” track (a small side project of Ruslan Yusipov in 2003-2004 for which he was awarded a diploma in the nomination “Compositing work”).
In essence, there is no cloud, you are either working with a generic or with your own extension, which generic learns a route from.
But let’s return to the emitted information and language processing. How can Niagara 26 generate such accurate patterns in translation from Russian to English, even though there has been no EN or RU emissions yet? In the “Niagara” 26 software modem, as mentioned in the review, the concept of generic protocols such as RIPv1, RIPv2, OSPF, OSPFv3, BGP, etc. is used, so it is worth considering this set of protocols as a set of generic languages of the Machine Translation cloud. In essence, there is no cloud, you are either working with a generic or with your own extension, which generic learns a route from. At the moment, I enable the EN – RU language pair in Compositor NRTOS through other languages, issued through tracks to their carriers. The carrier, which works with the software modem, uses only generic languages and learns the route from Niagara L3VPN peers. There are a lot of languages available to “Niagara” 26 software modem through emissions, extremely rare and not very useful from a practical point of view. The only practical benefit of the Caribbean language group, which was of my personal interest, is the study of their rhythm, namely sequence, which produces language patterns. I used these patterns as a part of my research on Milton Erickson language patterns, which I used in pre-NLP era hypnosis. I studied how these patterns aid in therapeutic way for overcoming mood oriented problems. The main concept of compositing this way is to alter the mental state so you can be a more comfortable person. Compositor achieves this goal by rapidly rebuilding SPT (shortest path tree) and changing the next-hop to default route of this tree.
The rule for me states if I can’t afford a studio for producing new music of the same quality as named projects I should make an emission of previous works to recultivate the exposure I achieved earlier.
So if you feel comfortable, when you are producing music with Caribbean patterns you can make an emission of such music by evoking RPF vector paths to the servers, which host closed-loops using these patterns as interrupters. This action is fishing, and any media aggregator uses this scheme. I only issue emissions as part of my royalty collection project. I just monitor servers, which performed my music and compare this with the statistics from RAO (Russian Authors Organization) and really astonished with results, because according to my network counting method my music performed up to 50-60 times a day and no income whatsoever from RAO side. This raises a question of this organization validity as an entity working with collective rights on my Exalted and Boosty projects.
The rule for me states if I can’t afford a studio for producing new music of the same quality as named projects I should make an emission of previous works to recultivate the exposure I achieved earlier. And I’m facing an exact situation that’s why the whole set of Compositor Software instruments produced. But returning to NLP with Niagara 26 I used it to produce documentation for Compositor NRTOS 9.0.2 based virtual router. I should report progress now: more than 2000 pages translated and edited on Russian language using the named method now. This leaves me about 500 pages of untranslated material and I’m full of enthusiasm of making this work till the end. The end result of this work is Compositor NRTOS with completely reworked interface to reflect attribute-value pairs from virtual router documentation. This work is now 95% finished and to say honest I’m satisfied with results as it enables to work with Compositor NRTOS 9.0.2 more professional following system administration guidelines, which apply to basic 2nd order closed-loop interface. What I learned from documentation is that any protocol is a closed-loop of some kind with its own parametrized interface. And this brings me back to my initial request: does the chosen system of values corresponds with the reality that has developed in the world after the Cuban missile crisis, and if so, is it not a repetition of the previous history only in our own country (Russia)? Because the Trojan horses that are sent to us under the guise of “music programs” are very reminiscent of Khrushchev’s “secret ships” that transported missiles to Cuba.
As I learned from revealed Compositor interface the geographical position is essential in work of that loop station. Even altering a location within one city will change the internal SPT. Thus, this proves that the Compositor interface is a universal Turing machine, and therefore can be represented as any protocol of a telecommunication system. The already cited 8 parts of the documentation (including the Multicast chapter) prove that the main task of Cycling’74 MaxMSP software (as well as Ableton Live 9 and 10) is to plan and implement DDoS attacks. Part 9 on MPLS only confirms my concerns. First, the circular stack in the form of a torus is not taken into account, on which MPLS labels are displayed, both merged and layered. Secondly, after loading the full version of Compositor NRTOS version 9.0.2, the timer shows 30 minutes. This means that the MaxMSP scheduler runs when the DSP code is compiled. And the whole POST process takes place over the MPLS protocol during the compilation of the protocols, since openGL performing the MPLS functions is a backdoor link or connection with a feedback leak. Also, based on these labels, the remote side (Cycling ’74) makes a decision about system startup or compilation error. Therefore, I believe that the method of presenting the Cycling’ 74 MaxMSP as the software for carrying out DDoS attacks is correct. And the whole method that the company-investor of this project has used over the past 2 years has been successful.