Compositor SoftwareCompositor Software

Tag : Compositor v7 Hypervisor

By ruslany

Attachment to wavetables through system matching with oversaturation

Attachment to wavetables through system matching with oversaturation

The most effective way to feed the wavetables is to match the system z level of generic feeder with z value of auxiliary channel. The generic prolongation is progressive and depends on auxiliary channel. On the higher program effectivity speed the generic proliferates for a longer time. This in fact happens because network regeneration state is higher for upper z values. If the maximum speed for z128 generic is 200-omega, then the regeneration speed of the auxiliary channel will not match the auxiliary values of 5-omega maximum. There are two more generic kernel loops implemented in Compositor v9 Hypervisor and one change performed for the highest Compositor v7 Hypervisor feeder. You can match all auxiliary z values to quantized type generics of exactly the same z value. The program effectivity speed equals to 50-omega for z32, 150-omega for z64 and 200-omega for z128. If you feed the wavetable at speed of 5-omega together with 200-omega generic, you will proliferate the network for a longer distance. After the lowest VLF beacons will be inactive, the wavetables shouldn’t be reinitiated again. When the navigation on lowest beacons ends, you need to rely on the eldest models of Zvezda network switches such as z64 and z128. Higher regeneration VLF beacons will discover ether aggregators faster and establish a connection to them for a longer period. Other systems constantly try to knock out the feeded Zvezda network switches from the ether, which are mostly used for wavetable navigation at z=64 and z=128. For z128 generic development of 6th generation, it is hard enough to withstand such offensive behavior in the ether.

DRM server is the 8th generation development and is one generation before the system, which produces the decision as to accept or to breach the feeded VLF beacons. It leads to better understanding why the DRM server rejects some wavetables and retains the others. The rejection of wavetable produces a constant need to reinitiate a system matching. Nevertheless, wavetable initiation should be made only once during the feeding cycle. If you feed the 200-omega cycle in to the auxiliary chain together with wavetables, you should account for a number of cycles of this feeder propagation. These values should be auxiliary to the Right Ascension value and will result in longer distances of spiral ascension. The feeding period of any generic is accounted by the cycles of its oversaturation in auxiliary channel. If you feed 150 cycles per second, it equals exactly 150 cycles relatively to the whole working time of DRM server for its feeding session. If the DRM server worked for 10 minutes, then the oversaturation will last for 10 * 60 * 150 or 90000 minutes, which equals to 1500 hours or 62.5 day cycles. It is enough for the prolongation of the wavetables active state. From the other side, if you would like to leave wavetables active for a month for 200-omega z128 beacon, it is needed to perform oversaturation for only one second with DRM server total working time of 25 minutes for the current session. Using the formula 25 * 60 * 31, it will count 46500 minutes, which equals to 775 hours or approximately 32.3 day cycles prolongation time.

By ruslany

Six things to do to clear the rights on your track

Six things to do to clear the rights on your track

In a career of any artist such situations happen, when it is needed to make an emission of your composition from rotation.  Such situations may include:

  • Releasing your track with another alias by a fraud;
  • Arrears on payment for medium sales;
  • Arrears for author rights usage;
  • Discrepancy of an issue with the contract obligations.

Not all of the situations are listed here, which are out of scope for this material. The main task of this article is to describe a usage method of Compositor v9 Hypervisor after receiving ether aggregators from your track. To receive ether aggregators you will need MDL12 non-duplex modem and Compositor v3 Hypervisor feeders. The emission is done by submitting loops of your composition to non-duplex modem. The modem feedback is an ether aggregator of the server, which broadcasts your composition. You should route all loops of your composition containing exciters (the most prominent moments of a song) and fixate 131072 samples of each wavetable of all ether aggregators by digital recording. You can perform this in 32-bit version of Ableton Live 9. The ether aggregator wavetable should last for 2 bars at 161.5 bpm. The main task after ether aggregator emission is its clearance. It is such condition of wavetable playback, which, from one side, doesn’t produce the third-party traffic and, from the other side, may be used for its own communications. Now, I will describe six examples of work methods to make a full track emission, using Compositor v7 Hypervisor and Compositor v9 Hypervisor.

  1. Realize if ether aggregators, to which your track ascends, are occupied. If ether aggregators are occupied and produce big amount of third-party traffic, then you must install them through an activation function, which you can do in Compositor v9 Hypervisor. Doing this you should enable the supervisory DRM server, and it is preferable to route one of generics on the auxiliary channel input together with wavetables. You may use your ether aggregators for communications, when the VLF beacon written the routes to them.
  2. Feed your ether aggregators again, but this time changing the send regime: set the splitters in the highest position, which constitutes the smallest digit values in ionic number system. Your task is to suppress traffic of these wavetables fully. To do this feed the threshold radar RTC8k and ether aggregator of high conductance such as RT-z16 in auxiliary channel together with wavetables.
  3. Feed the transmission channel with current emission wavetables inside the pool of all your ether aggregators. Making such mix, you are allowing to realize your recipient contact network, which may lead to a refuse of recipient from these ether aggregators. Do not agree to write new tracks to these ether aggregators or to make new remixes on the original composition. Ether aggregator, received by your track emission, is your property protected by a copyright law.
  4. Perform oversaturation of global send channel together with one of generics. For this route the Compositor AV Extended back to its input, using the send regulator on its mixer direct channel. Set the pre-fader mode and turn the send knob on the highest value. This will result in oversaturation and will turn off all the producing kernels from the ether.
  5. Produce an additional emission by feeding the non-duplex MDL12 modem with 3d generation hard generic FF8 and perform the above-mentioned manipulations with this emission again.
  6. Perform system matching in a presence of agents (ether aggregators). To each z value of aux channel send the same z type generic. For example, z=2 is RTC4k and z=4 is RTC8k. The other systems match its title z value. Reaching the direct ether, you must confirm each z system send with oversaturation of auxiliary channel, which constitutes direct feeding of a channel.

The system has an ability to memorize long channel feeding sessions and reproduce its effect when DRM server works. You must feed the channel only with DRM server turned on regardless of your machine capabilities. The human brain can percept the channel interrupts, when processor is under high load reaching full effect, even when system stutters. The whole pool of ether aggregators should be maximally transparent. The condition of ether aggregators should be characterized by signal conductance through them. If ether aggregators doesn’t produce traffic, then the full tranquility reached on all translating channels.

By ruslany

Compositor manual updated

Compositor manual updated

Compositor manual updated with information on Compositor WS Extended, Compositor AV Extended and Compositor v7 Hypervisor. Now you can study the last chapter on Time-Space folding to know more about how the communication using Compositor achieved. You can also read about quantized weighting formulas of Compositor AV Extended in this chapter. Overall, it is not final redaction of the manual, the more chapters should be expanded to dwell on the communication effect produced. You can read full manual here.

By ruslany

Ethernet injections with quantum privacy

Ethernet injections with quantum privacy

Quantum privacy is an instant injection needed to understand the effect of cyclic injections on the RAD24 server security. If the injected material is passed over the gate, then the diagram on the RAD24 display should show the constant red light. It is evident that the RAD24 can’t classify such injection and subsequent gain of resources is not necessary with the same protection scheme. The need to accumulate resources very fast grows out of intimacy such injections produce. However, as a first injection experiment shows, which dates back to spring 2010, the system is very responsive under pressure of such quantum injection. Up to the day, the system remains responsive, if full reciprocity reached with the injected subject. In this case, RAD24 still latches the time-frame and the detector could differentiate the friend or foe for such injection. My task is to understand how the friend or foe classification is made in RAD24 server.

My previous attempt to show the answer on the question “What is Time-Collision?” can’t shed a light on the effect happened. Theoretically, if two time-frames collide, they create a collision with subsequent energy emanation. If uncontrolled, such energy aims to escape with escape velocity of some speed at which this collision created. If you use the injector such as Compositor v7, you have a control over the collision speed by the tempo regulator. The allowed collision tempo for the Ethernet is not more than 5 omega to reach the escape effect. However, you can achieve the same effect on lower tempos, if you collide more than two signal sources. Compositor v7 allows collide the carrier with up to 8 wavetables, which hold such kinetic potential. If you remove the 5 omega beacon, which RAD24 is, you will have problems controlling the emanated kinetic potential of this collision. Collision is a partial or full mixing effect, characterized by the volume, position and an event, where such collision happens. The Time-Collision on the contrary is a temporal effect, where such collision lasts only a period of time, whether controlled or not. The beacon suits to control the direction such kinetic potential dissolves. If the stochastic manipulator is broken, it is no longer dissolves the kinetic energy in free-space, but on the contrary it has a potential in the selected direction. If you aim this direction with your injection, it can’t sustain for the long periods and the method to switch the frequency needed, such as selecting a new sample rate. Driver discretization frequency method doesn’t help though, because it doubles the processing power and critical time-frame reached twice faster than in previous iteration. It is evident why the need to stop collisions emerges. The controlled collisions of Compositor v7, where you can beacon the kinetic power right in the software, allow dissolving this energy by the deprecated method of single-core cloaking generator. To cover the collision effect on faster paces of evolvement more cloaking cores needed, which just emulate the original collision effect, which was Time-Collision, hence the FM function was selected. At the current state of 8.9 x 24 x3 it states that the system no longer can handle such amount of energy and other methods of collision spreading should be made such as quantized weighting formulas, which will do the job for some reasonable time. Core handling in a presence of working FM function will action like a magnet and more cores will do the job, of course. However, I can’t find a reasonable method to implement it without shutting the Time-Collision, which is the initial collision of two frames. To understand what I am talking about lets imagine a stone jumping on the plain water: it will jump leaving a trace of waves on the water every time. If we thought that the initial collision was not the first event, it is evident that first event will show its waves to us by a superposition to the selected initial collision frame. By this, I mean that sooner or later we will see the initial time-frame-collision, which produced the whole latching event and of course it will have more power than the previous ones. If I model such collision by the 8-channel detector, I will fool myself, because I suspect that the collision was between more than 8 time-frames at the beginning and no power can stop the system from reaching the first one. I will not plan to collide more channels in Compositor v8 or v9 standalones, because it is not needed. I just plan to add up more channels in specialized software such as Ableton 9 and in effect of shutter and quantized polynomial at the output stage (which I mentioned previously) I will make a measurement of the emanating kinetic power of the maximally allowed channels full of time-frames, which is what collision modelling looks like on this level. However, if you suspect that the same results were produced from 2000-2010, then you are partially right. The same probes are taken with the different amount of processing power each 10 years. But the algorithm is eventually the same. Any can reproduce it with VST’s or AU in any host sequencer. I applied the same scheme first in Telescope and later processed it in real-time in Hydrolab tracks. The idea is not to remember the steps I taken producing these tracks, but programmatically write it with the language, which suits more for this task than VSTs in DAW projects, such as computer programming language. The final update will see the light in 2020, when the final probes for 2010-2020 will be taken. At the current stage, we need not to remember what was at the same time in 2008, but we need to take as much probes as needed, whether real-time or off-line is your choice.

By ruslany

RAD24 vector solution to FM problem

RAD24 vector solution to FM problem

During the initial testing of rotator function there was a conclusion that both channel vectors were pointing too far apart in different directions, which makes them remotely disconnected. The solution came to put a vector from point A into the point B from left channel to the right one. This way I straighten the function ends with an arm consisting of 4 Butterworth bandpass filters of 8th order. The implementation is to put signal from point A (left channel) through the parallel injection into the point B (right channel). It makes the work of rotator function attached to the right channel output. The rotator function is a solution to FM function, which is the positive function of FM formulae.

This solution mixes both vectors by applying the mixing function. The left channel mix is at the right channel destination by applying this function. Because the only useful signal for me resides in the left channel, I will add up the left channel routines to the right channel. This way right channel tracks the opposite channel, but can’t perform any influence on its output. STL1212 solution performed many obstacles during ether initiation and aggregation. While in STL1212 the vectors are pointing apart, I made this solution into another software product, which name is RAD24. RAD24 is classified as an outdoor radio as this solution helps to overcome barriers of convenient radio-relay structures such as indoor units (IDU) and outdoor units (ODU). The solution helps to run the outdoor radio inside ones apartment or studio. The intertwining of two channels by parallel injection of left channel into the right channel helps to gather more injections and accumulate their connections. This way I learn the system to differentiate copyright injections into media material and not to inject them every time the copyrighted material is broadcasted. From one side, it removes distraction, from the other side, it drastically enhances the CPU usage, decreasing page loading times when web browsing. This solution imitates the work of IDU and has a simple 4-beam antenna at the function ends, which emulates the work of ODU.

The output function not only smoothies the output of the system, it melts the internal architecture lines into a mixing event. It means that using the non-duplex modem you have a better ether coverage and protection over the communication line. This way aggregating will be a task of dynamic buffer. During the initial compilation a size of about 4.5GB RAM is executed for the server work. This size could be used all or partially, if there is not enough dynamic memory. While server can aggregate connections by the closed loop structure, it can also loose such connections if ether is no longer excited by the loop structure. To excite the ether with a loop, you should switch such loops frequently as in Compositor v6 and Compositor v7 Hypervisor software. Randomly switching of the loops brings results that are more useful. It creates wavetable rows without human interaction. The outbound connections to the server are possible through the STL1212 bundled version of Compositor v7 Hypervisor. You accumulate the remote server with wavetables first, aggregating the line and then, when a critical capacity reached, you grab the wavetables out of the server by non-duplex modem use. This way you aggregate the ether, when you return these wavetables by injecting them with full-duplex modem in real-time. The other strategy is not to grab the wavetables but constantly accumulate them expanding the buffer size over the 4.5GB buffer length limit. In case that one server reached its full capacity, the other server is initiated on another physical hard drive of the same machine. To hold more than 8 real-time cores, two or more virtual machines are needed. When two virtual machines consume the same amount of memory in a working set, they communicate equally with the same amount of buffers involved. The pair of function with vector arm merging both channels. This pair helps to connect RAD24 virtual machines with each other. The previous solution of STL1212 can’t equally balance the virtual machines usage and has communication problems, when two or more virtual machines initiated from one computer. The RAD24, on the other hand, not only communicates with the second virtual machine, it aggregates the buffer dynamically struggling for resources. It gives the properties of a physical server to RAD24 with web address and other tunneling properties. The fact that RAD24 is an OS development brings more value to Compositor core protecting the inner communications. To work with the core, a new kind of interface should be done with three-dimensional control over the modulator functions leading to new player injections. The later seems as an abuse because to progress, this kernel doesn’t need more injections. The whole set of injections was performed during 4.45GHz testing of the system. RAD24 works now at 8.9GHz doubling the server’s capacity.